From the Basement to the Penthouse (Part 2): 2008-2010 Preparing for the King

 

It was 2008 and the much anticipated summer of 2010 was being discussed. The favorites to land guys like LeBron James and Dwyane Wade were teams like the Knicks, Bulls, Clippers, and the Nets. Nobody talked about the Miami Heat as a possibility and why would they? After all the Knicks later that year would trade guys like Jamal Crawford and Zach Randolph for nothing in order to make cap room. But it would be those moves that would be the Knicks downfall, as they essentially forfeited their next two seasons in hopes of signing LeBron. The people of New York were positive they had LeBron in the bag.pat_riley_oj_mayo

Miami made the smart move, Pat Riley knew that in order to persuade The King to change courts he had to make the Heat an attractive destination. However, before Riley could make a pitch to LeBron James and Chris Bosh, he had to make sure he had the money to re-sign Wade, sign James and Bosh, and fill out the roster with talent. Well Riley kept it a secret and he took a page out of the San Antonio Spurs book by flying under the radar. So how would Riley get the cap room? With a series of calculated roster moves…

1. One-year rental plan

Pat Riley needed away to have a team that could compete in the playoffs but not commit long term in order to have cap space in free agency. A little over year after the Heat acquired Marion and Banks from the Suns, Miami traded the pair to the Toronto Raptors for Jermaine O’Neal and Jamario Moon in February of 2009. The trades with the Suns and Raptors allowed Miami to be a playoff team and help establish coach Spoelstra as one of the NBA’s best up and coming coaches. This would be key in Riley pitch to free agents.

2. Build through the draft

The second move made by Riley was building through the draft. This is key to any team looking to get better, and Miami found plenty of talent. In 2008 draft Miami came out with number two pick, Michael Beasley and Mario Chalmers. I know, I know Beasley was a bust but he did a solid job in Miami and was key in acquiring the big three (see Part 1). As for Chalmers he has developed nicely for the Miami Heat as their point guard. He quickly made an impression on defense as he set the Heat’s franchise record for steals in a game (9) as a rookie. Chalmers also played well in the Heat’s NBA finals appearences in 2011 and 2012.

3. Smart contracts

Pat Riley knew what his ultimate goal was, to have as much cap space as possible for the summer of 2010. So Riley signed all his players to contracts that would expire after the 2009-2010 season. By the team the draft rolled around Miami had three players on the roster (Chalmers, Beasley, and Cook).

In order to create even more cap space Riley would trade Daequan Cook and the Heat 1st round selection to the Thunder. By doing this it allowed Miami to dump Cooks contract as well as trade out of the first round. The significance of trading out of the first round for Miami is avoiding the cap hit. NBA rules make it so every player selected in the first gets a guaranteed contract but players selected in the second round do not get guaranteed contracts. Pat Riley had done it, the draft was over and Free Agency 2010 had arrived, Pat Riley had given the Heat deep pockets with $48 million in salary cap space.

 

 

 

 

Pacers Just Made This a Series

LeBron+James+Indiana+Pacers+v+Miami+Heat+Game+VsjgzJrviz1xThe Pacers threatened in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals on Miami’s home court. They came away scratching their heads and feeling like they just missed out on a huge statement to open the series. Yet, the salvo has been fired, and the statement was made – this team can actually beat the Miami Heat in a game. The question is, can they do it consistently and for an entire series?

Game 2 held the answer, and it was an emphatic “yes”. The Pacers were able to get over the hump – and the criticism hurled against Frank Vogel for not leaving in Roy Hibbert in the closing seconds was reversed as he kept Hibbert in and Miami was unable to level the game and force another OT. The Pacers emerged victorious 97-93.

So the narrative becomes, imagine if the Pacers closed out Game 1? They would be up 2-0 heading back to Indiana for favorable odds to dislodge the reigning NBA champs.

But is that really the story? There is something to consider here – yes, the Pacers have the ability to beat the Heat, but truthfully the Heat just haven’t played their game yet. Let’s chew on some stats:

  • In Game 2, the Pacers shot 50%. They shot 44.6% in Game 1. So, they improved their FG% and got an improved result. That tells us nothing unexpected – if you improve your efficiency and hold all other aspects of your game, then you should get a better result. They got a win.
  • The Pacers shot 28.6% from three point range in Game 1, then shot 41.7% in Game 2. Again, improvement leads to better result.
  • Another important phase of the game is free throw shooting. In Game 1, the Pacers shot 75% and in Game 2 they shot 81%. But you already know what I am going to say and yep, improvement leads to better result.

What about the Heat?

  • In Game 1, Miami shot 47.7% from the field and in Game 2 shot 46.6%. Slight decrease but then again, the differential between these two teams is knife blade thin. 
  • In Game 1, the Heat shot 27.8% from three and 31.8% in Game 2. An improvement but of their 73 FG attempts, 22 were from three point range. Only 18 of the 86 FG attempts in Game 1 were from three. This indicates either more willingness to shoot threes, or an inability to get into the lane.
  • Which brings us to free throws. In Game 1 the Heat generated 25 FTAs but only shot 64%. In Game 2, they were able to nab 26 FTAs (Game 1 did have OT, remember) which shows improvement but they also only hit on 69% of them. Again, that is an improvement from Game 1, but in comparison to the regular season, hardly “Heat-worthy”.

Everything else is pretty even down the line. Rebounds slightly favor the Pacers, but nothing too substantial to really point at. Considering that the Pacers entire offensive game is predicated on the low post with David West and Roy Hibbert getting a bulk of the work, this is to be expected.

Yet, the Heat have not shown their A game yet. They haven’t shot particularly well while the Pacers have been above their averages. The Heat’s free throw shooting has been uncharacteristically bad – and when you have a differential in this series of 1 point in Game 1 and 4 points in Game 2, that is critical. Ray Allen only makes one out of two free throws? Lebron James with 2 turnovers in close out time, the final minute of the game? These are trends that are not likely to continue.

The series shifts to Indiana where the Pacers will surely favor having the home crowd and, arguably, a much more livelier and basketball-intelligent crowd than in Miami. In order for the Heat to get back in this series, they will have to play Heat basketball. That means playing strong, aggressive defense that traps the perimeter players of the Pacers and forces them to struggle in delivering the ball to the post.

There will be adjustments – on both sides. And everyone will have a theory. Realistically, the Heat have not had their signature game yet in the series with Battier, Allen, and even a hobble Mike Miller not hitting threes. Nothing has been signature Miami and when that happens expect to lose. The fact that they have been able to win a game speaks volumes of where this series is heading. The Pacers should feel good but they also recognize this series has not yet really been played at the level it is capable of going. Miami came out and blew out the Bulls a few times after blowing Game 1 in that series. Miami very well could do the same to Indiana.

From the Basement to the Penthouse (Part 1): 2007-2008 Rock Bottom

zo

The Miami Heat made the journey from the worst record in the league to NBA Champions and perennial contenders in just 5 seasons. It's easy to forget that the Miami Heat at one time the worst team in the league. So the question is how were the Heat … [Continue reading]

Lebron’s 4th MVP One Vote Shy of Unanimous; Proves to be Smart Marketing Move by Washburn

lebron james mvp 2013

Lebron was right. Well, sort of. "It was probably a writer out of New York that didn't give me that vote." In fact, it wasn't - the writer was Gary Washburn from the Boston Globe. But, he was swayed by a player for New York - Carmelo … [Continue reading]

Could the Miami Heat Go Undefeated Throughout the Playoffs?

images

With every passing day of NBA playoff basketball, it looks more and more likely that the Miami Heat could be the first team since the NBA has had 4 playoff rounds to go undefeated. A task not so easily accomplished, the 2001 Los Angeles Lakers were … [Continue reading]